It takes me around 70 minutes of real life time to produce 10 minutes of video after years of work flow optimizations and using what I think is one of the best tools available to make screencasts. Using a bad video editor (and I'm not saying Shotcut is bad because I haven't installed it yet) is just a really draining and time wasting experience.
There's just so many things you absolutely need to be happy and productive when recording - especially if you plan to do this for a living. This is after having recorded about 50 hours of real-time video over a few years. I'm all for OSS too but when it comes down to it, if you're serious about video editing, this isn't really a tool you can make compromises on (and trust me, I spent a lot of time trying before pulling the trigger on buying Camtasia).
LINUX VIDEO EDITING SOFTWARE 2018 MAC
It's all about how fast it is to go from an empty folder to a high production quality video.Ĭamtasia is one of the only reasons why I run Windows so if your project can solve all of those problems, that would be an incredible feat since Camtasia seems to have no intent on supporting anything but Mac / Windows.Īlso if it helps gauge the comparison I have tried kdenlive about 6 months ago and compared to Camtasia I would rate kdenlive a 0.001 and Camtasia a 9.5 on the sole task of "quickly create a nice looking screencast". Where does Shotcut stand compared to that?Īt this point price isn't an issue for people in a position to create videos. This includes complex animations and tooltips with doing nothing more than dragging around a few sliders.īasically you can get up and going with an excellent work flow as 1 single person who isn't a video editing god. How does it compare directly to Camtasia in a real world comparison?įor example with Camtasia, you can click 1 button and have your desktop + audio + optional webcam all being recorded to your video project, and then you can hop in and edit it with a bunch of great tools and presets. The weirdest part, though, was that it was supposed to have been open-sourced after EditShare acquired it, then they didn't, and they've been saying "it'll be open sourced when it's ready" for almost 4 years now. While it's more stable than some FOSS NLEs, it's still shakier than Avid or Premiere on well-supported hardware, with the distinct advantage that it's got native Linux support.
LINUX VIDEO EDITING SOFTWARE 2018 FREE
Its best output formats are behind a licensing wall, though they're still far cheaper than Adobe, Apple, or Avid, and you can do almost all your actual cutting with the free version.
It's also capable of doing other things like handling basic A/V effects and compositing, but not as well as other NLEs or compositors. unique, but I'm not sure I'm qualified to say it's an objectively easier or better workflow than AE - YMMV.
It has a well-earned reputation for cutting stuff like drama and comedy, where effects and pre-rendered sequences take a back seat to well-timed cuts between takes and fast iterative editing feedback. It shines with large video asset databases, and once you get a few weeks of muscle memory behind it (or a few months if you're coming from FCP or FCPX), it's a fast tool when making lots of simple cuts. Lightworks has a very narrow use case, heavily focused on cutting feature films and longform video with a very different workflow than most non-Avid NLEs.
0 kommentar(er)
